I'm being slandered. Things people are hearing about me are not true. I
have never said anything threatening or sexually inappropriate in
public, ever. It's never happened. I'm someone who wants to be left alone.
I don't want my privacy invaded in any way. I'm someone who wants to keep
his private business and personal life as private as possible. Invasions of
my privacy are completely non consensual, there's no consent or
communication between me and the persons involved, none. No consent was
given to anyone ever. Eavesdropping and wiretapping would be criminal, it
would make the perpetrator a felon. Video surveillance in any of the
apartments I've lived in is criminal, making the perpetrator a felon and
a sex offender. They're lying about someone who wants no contact with them
at all, neither direct or indirect. They have absolutely no legal
right to do anything but leave me alone.
I talked about immature and inappropriate comments that were being made
about oral sex back in January. I have have nothing to do with these
comments. I don't want anything to do with the individuals making them.
They have to take responsibility for their immature sexual behavior and
comments. Their sexual interest in me is disturbing, immature and
completely inappropriate. False accusations are likely the result of
psychological projection, it's just another example of scapegoating. I'm
a completely innocent person who wants to be left alone. They need to be
criminally prosecuted and they need to take responsibility for the
outrageous sexual harassment of someone who wants nothing to do with them.
I'm a private individual who is in no way to blame for any of it.
Psychiatry and the drug industry do not profit from people recovering from
their mental health problems. They don't make money on alternatives to
psychiatry and it's bio-reductionest approach to the treatment of mental
health. They simply don't make money and it's all about money for the drug
industry and the psychiatric quacks they have in their pockets. They don't
profit from a healthy diet rich in omega 3 fatty acids from fish, they
don't make money on regular exercise, runners aren't big cash cows for the
drug industry. They don't make money on real insight into your mental
health problems, it's something they don't want you to have. They want
you to reduce your problems to a genetic chemical imbalance that they claim
is corrected by their drugs. They make money on psudoscientific nonsense,
like in the drug commercials. They don't make money on insight or
science. The drug industry makes
money selling drugs, psychiatric quacks make money prescribing them.
Take a look at the drug industry. I'll use the criminal
corporate entity Eli Lilly as an example. It's such a good example of
greed and wrongdoing. I know for a fact that the people at Lilly knew
quite a bit about their blockbuster drug Zyprexa, take a look at internal
company documents. Apparently what they knew didn't stop Lilly CEO John
Lechleiteir from encouraging drug reps to discuss prescribing Zyprexa to
children and teenagers, something that would have lead to predictable
problems for those kids. It's not only that, serious weight gain with that
class of drugs is really only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to
problems created by those drugs. Lilly makes money at the expense of
those kids, it makes money on disability, cognitive dysfunction, obesity,
drugs those kids might end up taking for diabetes. Right now that's how
they're making money. Another example is how the company marketed the drug
to treat dementia in the elderly knowing it didn't work. There's a good
chance that they were aware that the drugs would be used by psychiatric
quacks to chemically lobotomize those folks, making things easier and more
profitable for the nursing homes they reside in. Something done at their
expense. What you have is an industry making money at the expense of
their patients, not from what's good for them. They profit from what's bad
for them, knowingly.
The drug industry profits from knowingly replacing the science your doctor
or even a psychiatric quack relies on with the shameless marketing of their
products. There's a few smoking gun examples from the paper linked to in
the article above here. It's marketing based medicine at the expense of
patients. That's what's going on in the mental health field today.
I'm just the subject of a lot of really vicious dehumanizing slander. I
think they're just lying criminals who want to tell just their side of the
story while justifying their wrongdoing. I would never threaten anyone or
even behave a little odd in public. Anyone who says I am is lying. I have
no desire to harm myself or anyone else. I'm fully responsible for
everything I say and do, without exception. Any mental health problems I
might have aren't causing me any problems and I don't think they'll ever
cause anyone else any problems ever. If anything my lack of mental health
related problems are the problem for people slandering me for pretty
obvious reasons.
Any intrusion into my personal life if completely unwanted. I have no
control over the outrageous sexual comments being made. If they're
questioning people about me sexually I have nothing to do with it. They are
off on their own talking about things like that and I have no control over
any of it. I don't want any invasion of my privacy at all. I don't like
people looking at what I bought at the supermarket checkout. What flavor
jelly I bought is to personal for me to divulge voluntarily.
It's like people around me don't understand that what's being done to me is
illegal. They have absolutely no legal right to do what they're doing.
Eavesdropping and video surveillance anywhere a person has a reasonable
expectation of privacy is criminal in New York State. Not leaving me
alone, not letting me live alone is called stalking and harassment.
When someone with no legal right does what they're doing it's a crime, that
makes them criminals. I don't want my privacy invaded in any way. I don't
want to be followed in public. I don't people I come in contact with
questioned. It's as nonconsensual as nonconsensual can possibly be and it's
causing me quite a bit of distress and material harm.
Any decisions I've made regarding my mental health care didn't cause me to
lose any of my rights. People have the right to make those decisions
regarding their care. In New York State people involuntary committed to
psychiatric hospitals have the right to refuse psychiatric treatment. This
is from Rivers v. Katz, 67 NY 2d 485:
In our system of a free government, where notions of individual autonomy
and free choice are cherished, it is the individual who must have the final
say in respect to decisions regarding his medical treatment in order to
insure that the greatest possible protection is accorded his autonomy and
freedom from unwanted interference with the furtherance of his own desires
(see, Matter of Erickson v Dilgard, 44 Misc 2d 27, 28, supra; see
generally, Olmstead v United States, 277 US 438, 478 [Brandeis, J.,
dissenting]; Union Pac. Ry. Co. v Botsford, 141 US 250, 251; Davis v
Hubbard, 506 F Supp 915, 930-933; Pratt v Davis, 118 Ill App 161, 166, affd
224 Ill 300, 79 NE 562). This right extends equally to mentally ill persons
who are not to be treated as persons of lesser status or dignity
because of their illness (Superintendent of Belchertown State School v
Saikewicz, 373 Mass 728, 370 NE2d 417). As noted by the Supreme Court
of Oklahoma, "[i]f the law recognizes the right of an individual to
make decisions about * * * life out of respect for the dignity and
autonomy of the individual, that interest is no less significant when
the individual is mentally or physically ill" (Matter of K. K. B., 609
P2d 747, 752).
They have no legal right to do what they're doing. Some nutjob just can't
stalk you and break the law all he wants because he heard you had some kind
of invalid psychiatric label. What they're doing is illegal and they have
no legal right at all. Discrimination in law enforcement and housing based
on disability is also prohibited by statute, namely the ADA. They're just
slandering their innocent victim as being violent or prone to violence because
they're monstrous heinous fucking criminals.
I'm being slandered and lied about by people involved in a crime and their
supporters. Any eavesdropping, wiretapping or any invasion of my privacy
whatsoever is either criminal or tortious. What they're doing is a crime.
They would have absolutely no right either morally or legally. They're
simply criminals. Criminals lying about their victim. Use Common sense there's
a motive for them to lie about me.
Sexual comments being made about be are outrageous an completely inappropriate.
I'm not doing anything to encourage any of it. Any sexual comments, comments
about oral sex or anything like that aren't coming from me, they don't have
anything to do with me. The only thing like that would be me making remarks
about psychiatrists being quack cocksuckers. Those remarks were made in my
home, in private. Anything sexual about me is nobody's business. Again any
intrusion into my privacy is completely unwanted so the talk is inappropriate
and harassing.
I would never believe that I was Jesus Christ, that there are demons or that
I have magical powers. It's just schizophrenic sounding bullshit. Again, I've
said it on this weblog before, I'm an atheist. I have no religious beliefs at
all. I would never say anything other than saying I'm an atheist if someone
asked or if someone starts a conversation with me about the subject.
A lot of what's being said is simply defamatory. People should really look
into the motives and the personality types of the persons making the comments.
I think there's a type of malign thought association involved with some
of the false accusations. What I mean is the accuser is associating his
own thoughts and impulses, some which are sexual, in a slanderous way. The
accusations don't have anything to with me or anything I think now or anything
I ever thought in the past. The accusations are false and I think there's
something seriously wrong with the person making them.
Thomas Szasz makes the comparison between coercive psychiatry and slavery
in his books Psychiatric Slavery and Liberation by Oppression. I think the
comparison is a very relevant and enlightening one. Readers should check out
this review of Liberty by Oppression here.
A group called the Treatment Advocacy Center is group that advocates for
forced treatment arguing that people who were given psychiatric labels
like bi-polar disorder and schizophrenia sometimes become dangerous and lack
insight into their illness. This group makes it sound like the number one
reason why someone would stop taking extremely harmful, intolerable and
ineffective drugs is a lack of insight into their illness. This is a group
that often over hypes violence to further it's forced treatment agenda. In
a debate with Judi Chamberlin of the National Empowerment Center
on forced treatment, psychiatrist E. Fuller Torrey, president of the
Treatment Advocacy Center states this about the part of the brain impaired
when someone lacks awareness of their illness:
Scientifically, it has been shown in many recent studies that 40% to
50% of individuals with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder have an
impaired awareness of their illness (also called impaired insight).
Their illness has impaired the function of the prefrontal cortex,
which is part of the brain that is used for self reflection and to
appreciate ones own needs.
Is it an illness impairing the function of the prefrontal cortex? Are the
drugs given to people in any way to blame for the impairment while on and
while off the drugs? In this interview with Nancy C. Andreason she talks
about a group of people labeled with schizophrenia that she's been following
since 1989. She found that people with schizophrenia are losing brain
tissue at a rate of 1 percent per year. The more drugs a persons been given
the more brain tissue they lose. When asked why she thought this was happening
she stated:
Well, what exactly do these drugs do? They block basal ganglia activity.
The prefrontal cortex doesn't the input it needs and is being shut down
by drugs. That reduces the psychotic symptoms. It also causes the prefrontal
cortex to slowly atrophy.
The folks at TAC may be advocating for treatment that causes the very condition
they then use to justify forced treatment.
I happened to see an episode of the Dr. Phil show on bipolar disorder a while
back. I don't own a television and I rarely ever watch TV, it's one of the
few times I've ever seen the show, probably the only time I ever sat down
to watch the whole thing. In it there was a guy named fred labeled with bipolar
disorder. They did fMRI of Fred's head and they found that there were a couple
things abnormal about Fred's fMRI. First thing they found was that there was
damage to Fred's brain that looked a lot like this pattern of brain damage.
They also found that voxels representing an area occupied by Fred's amygdala
lit up, something they attributed to anxiety that could have also indicated
that Fred was happy or sad during the imaging or something else.
I saw the show a long time ago, I could be wrong about the pattern of damage
or atrophy. It's something I thought readers might find interesting.
I'm someone who really hates the use of the term antipsychotic. The neuroleptic
drugs, drugs like Abilify, Seroquel, Risperdal, Invega, Geodon, and Haldol don't
have a specific antipsychotic effect. These drugs instead produce generalized
brain dysfunction not unlike an ice pick driven through your eye socket.
These drugs are anti-anything they get prescribed for and anti-anybody they
get prescribed to. In Peter Breggin's book Brain Disabling Treatments in
Psychiatry he points to research illustrative of the brain disabling
effects of the drugs. This is an excerpt from his book:
Peter Liddle and his colleagues (2000) used positron emission tomography
(PET) to study the effects of risperdone on the rate of metabolism on the
ventral striatum, thalamus, and frontal cortex. Their subjects were eight
neuroleptic-naive patients diagnosed with their first episodes of
schizophrenia.
First and foremost, Liddle et al. (2000) found that "a single dose of
risperdone produced decreases in metabolism in ventral striatum, thalamus
and frontal cortex." The authors identified this region as the
cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical feedback loop. This encompasses much of
the emotion-regulating centers in the limbic system and higher mental
centers in the frontal lobes. Dopaminergic neurotransmission plays a
significant role in this system and is profoundly blocked by risperdone.
Clearly this confirms that risperdone, like all neuroleptics, causes a
chemical lobotomy, with inevitable production of relative degrees of
apathy and indifference.
If psychiatry came up with a label and a symptom checklist that included things
like a preoccupation with sports, unusual excitement over the minutia of a
sporting event, and intrusive thoughts about sports they could make being a
sports announcer a psychiatric illness. They could then use the neuroleptic
drugs to reduce the symptoms of that newly defined psychiatric illness. Van
Putten and Marder's description of akinesia in Behavioral Toxicity of
Antipsychotic Drugs could have referred to sports announcers. It could
read like this:
In the treatment of sports announcers with neuroleptics, akinesia, in our
experience, produces a type of improvement. The patient talks less about
sports, but he talks less of everything; he is less bothered by a lay-up
or a touchdown, but he is less bothered by everything else as well; he
less invested in sports, but he is less invested in all else as well.
Many patients with akinesia experience a peculiar absence of emotions,
appear emotionally dead, and often state that everything is all right.
This type of improvement, which occurs particularly with higher doses,
is one we should not be proud of.
Most people don't know that the brain disabling effects of these drugs are
the primary effects of these drugs, it's not a side effect. It's interesting
to look at peoples subjective experience of taking the drugs, it gives
you some idea just how the drugs might be working.
The neuroleptic drugs are now being used to treat depression. They've just
begun marketing a neuroleptic drug named Seroquel direct to consumers. The
television ads for another neuroleptic drug called Abilify have been running
for a while now. If these drugs perform any better than a sugar pill it makes
you wonder how they work to treat the thoughts and feelings that may make
one depressed.
The things being said about me are nothing but vicious slander. It's just
defamatory. To suggest that I'm "aggressive" is just vicious dehumanizing
slander. It's just bullshit. I'm fully responsible for everything I do and
say. When I'm drinking I'm fully and completely responsible for everything
I do and say. It doesn't matter how much I drank because I'm fully responsible
for every single drop I drink. To suggest that I'm inhuman and
out of control and somehow "aggressive" is just complete bullshit. If I'm
falsely accused of something I expect to be held fully responsible for anything
I'm alleged to have done or said, if the allegation is criminal I demand
the right to face my accuser in a court of law. I'm aware of the law and
the duties I have towards others. I'm fully responsible for every action I
take and every utterance I make.
Psychiatry is a multi-billion dollar a year industry.
The drugs they use to treat people who get labeled with
schizophrenia are extremely profitable and their use is growing. The market
for these drugs has expanded to include the treatment of elderly patients
with dementia and children mislabeled as bipolar. Neuroleptic drugs like
Seroquel and Abilify are now being marketed to consumers as a treatment for
depression and bipolar disorder. There's a huge financial interest in literally
controlling what people think about these worthless brain damaging drugs,
mental illness and the mentally ill. The lies being told about me
are part of that effort to control what people think. It's an effort to control
what people think because the industry profits from harming people with these
drugs. If your someone who hasn't figured it out already the lies your being
told will help them sell harmful drugs to you and even get you to coerce others
into taking them.
The fact that I appear to be fully recovered and people who have known
me for a long time can't see anything wrong with me is a problem for someone
who's trying to control what you think about neuroleptic drugs. So is the
fact that I'm in really good health, the fact that I have a normal BMI, the
fact that I'm sexually healthy, that fact that I have a good diet and get
regular exercise. It's a real problem that I can run 10 miles. You might ask
yourself, well why would that be? It's because psychiatrists, the worthless
quacks who prescribe the drugs and apply psychiatric labels are a bunch of
brain damaging frauds chronicly disabling people with their treatments.
Quacks causing iatrogenic brain damage and physical illness with their
worthless brain damaging treatments go on to blame the chronic disability
they cause on a nonexistent chronic brain disease. People who recover
contradict their brain disease fraud. They'd have to admit that people like
me who recover through self-determination and informed decision making know
better than they do with their quack bio-medical babbling about correcting
something with drugs that cause brain dysfunction. The drug industry doesn't
profit from informed decision making, they profit from decisions made by a
psychiatric quack corrupted by industry influence.
When a small fraction of the chronically psychiatrized do something violent
there's no mention of the brain damage and dysfunction caused by the drugs or
the withdrawal psychosis that results from abruptly withdrawing from drugs
that are intolerable. The psychiatric quack is the expert, he can just point
the finger at his patient. It wasn't his or her fucking wonder drug it was an
underlying illness that he or she will find some fucking kind of evidence of
someday. There's a need to blame an underlying mental illness.
Lies being told about me are being told for a reason. Lies about
"schizophrenic" sounding religious or magical beliefs are most likely
part of an effort to decontextualize my mental health problems. Place the
blame on a genetic brain disease I've always had, something that was in my
genes. They're lies being told to perpetuate a fraud.
Psychiatry and the drug industry don't make money on me being a intelligent,
reasonable person living peacefully in my home. They make money on the chemical
equivalent of an ice pick driven through my eye socket. They're not profiting
from my programming skills here at joysoup.net. They profit from dehumanizing
and demonizing me and attempting to link me to violence no matter how false and
absurd the accusations are. They profit from any stigmatization including
sexual stigmatization. It's all so a psychiatric quack can continue his horror
and abuse and have nobody care.
Way too much is being made out of gangstalking. It's just being done to
connect me to beliefs that are held by others that might be or might be
considered delusional. Accusing me of having beliefs I don't have is like
attacking a delusional strawman. It's just part of a campaign of vicious
slander by people involved in activities that are either criminal or actionable
in civil court. Nobody should let accusations like that detract from the facts.
It's a fact that any surveillance is being conducted without my consent. It's
a fact that it's being conducted by persons with no right to do what they're
doing. It's a fact that those persons have no justification for what they're
doing. It's a fact that they are persons I want nothing to do with. As far
as I know they're private individuals with as much right to what they're
doing as I would have to do the same thing to them.
There are a lot of really outrageous sexual comments being made. These
comments are immature and completely inappropriate. Keep in mind I'm not
someone who wants his privacy invaded in any way. Nothing about me sexually
is anyone's business. It's harassing to be talked about sexually. I'd
prefer that people I've had contact with not answer sexual questions about
me. I value my privacy, if they're being paid they should at least ask for
more money.
They should just admit to being cowards and liars that prefer to slander
someone behind their back, saying that I'm violent or too stupid to talk
to is completely ridiculous. I have no desire to harm anyone. Even though
I think psychiatrists are the quacks and frauds they are I would never harm
one even if my human rights are abused.
Psychiatry and the drugs psychiatric practice revolves around is a
multi-billion dollar a year industry. Psychiatrists, the drug industry and
everyone connected profit form the prescribing of psychiatric drugs. It's
something that people I come across have completely lost sight of. A huge
money maker for both psychiatry and the drug industry are the neuroleptic
or so called antipsychotic drugs. These expensive drugs are the top revenue
producers in the United States topping cholesterol lowing drugs. These
brain damaging, brain disabling drugs, the use of which often leads to
chronic disability for people labeled with schizophrenia have
such a detrimental effect on a persons health that users of those drugs die
25 years earlier on average. Psychiatry, the drug industry and everyone
connected profit from that a lot like the tobacco industry profits from
its products. Psychiatry and the use of psychiatric drugs is fueling an
epidemic of mental illness, read Robert Whitaker's Anatomy of an Epidemic
here. It's an industry that doesn't make money on recovery and hope, it
makes money on the drug Zyprexa.
What people are hearing about me is just really vicious slander. It sounds
like Mindfreedom International and maybe other groups I've linked to in
the past are being slandered as a cult. Mindfreedom is psychiatric
consumer/survivor/ex-patient group not connected to the church of
Scientology or any other religious group. People might find a wide
variety of alternatives like acupuncture, yoga or meditation helpful in
dealing with mental health problems, it's each individuals personal choice.
Mindfreedom International is a group that's made up of those individuals
that advocates for the rights of people with psychiatric labels to make
those choices. The same is true of the Freedom Center a really
incredible peer support group, there's no link to any cult.
Personally I'm completely non-religious. I have no belief at all in any
kind of supernatural being or beings. I have no superstitious or magical
beliefs. I don't believe the carrying of a lucky charm, the performance of
any kind of ritual or the position of a planet would have any influence at
all on any future event. Anything being said to the contrary is just
complete and total bullshit.
I'm still trying to resolve my situation here in Syracuse. The individuals
involved are trying to make too much of gangstalking. Some of the things
they might be saying are untrue. It's probably an attempt to make people
believe I'm more paranoid about what they're doing than I really am. While I do
think what they're doing has a lot in common with what others have described, I
don't think anyone is using any kind of electronic harassment devices or
anything like that. The fact that there is surveillance, community involvement
and someone making accusations that I think has some kind of personality
disorder, maybe a narcissistic bully, makes it a lot like what others
described.
Things are really simple, any surveillance inside my home is either criminal
or tortious. There was never any consent given to anyone ever. I don't want
my privacy invaded in any way by anyone any where. If they're breaking the
law and they don't understand that they have no right to do what they're doing
they're criminally insane. It's that simple.
Anyone saying that I'm violent or out of control or uninsightful is slandering
me. If you were to walk up and talk to me you would find that I was as sane
and lucid as anyone you know. Things that are being said about my mental
health are just vicious slander. I'm fully in control and responsible for
everything I do and say. Because of what's being said I'm afraid that someone
might falsely report a threat or something else to the police in hopes of
having me arrested. I would never threaten anyone, it's something I guarantee
would never happen. I have no desire to harm anyone and I don't see any reason
at all to be making idle threats against anyone. If there were any reports
made in the past they were false ones.
